Skip to main content
Trade & Customs

Customs Valuation in India

The rules fixing the assessable value of imported goods, including additions for royalties and scrutiny of related party imports.

By Shreya PandeyUpdated August 2026

What Is Customs Valuation in India?

Customs valuation fixes the value of imported goods on which customs duty is calculated. India taxes most imports ad valorem — as a percentage of value — so this figure determines how much Basic Customs Duty, IGST and cess an importer pays. The rule is section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962: value is the transaction value — the price actually paid or payable for goods sold for export to India — provided the buyer and seller are not related and price is the sole consideration. The mechanics sit in the Customs Valuation (Determination of Value of Imported Goods) Rules, 2007 (CVR 2007), Notification No. 94/2007-Customs (N.T.), in force from 10 October 2007.

For most invoices between unrelated parties, valuation is a formality: the invoice price, adjusted for freight and insurance, is the assessable value. It becomes consequential the moment a foreign parent sells to its own Indian subsidiary, or a royalty is payable to a foreign licensor — both common in inbound investment structures.

Legal Basis

Section 14 — Transaction Value

Section 14(1)'s first proviso requires costs to be added to the price "to the extent and in the manner specified in the rules" — commissions, brokerage, engineering/design work, royalties, licence fees, and transportation, insurance, loading, unloading and handling. Its second proviso hands CVR 2007 the job of specifying when parties are "related," how to value goods with no sale or a related-party price, and how a declared value may be rejected. Clause (iv) of that same second proviso, added by the Finance Act, 2022, goes further: it lets the Government make rules imposing additional obligations on importers of goods the Board believes are being declared below their true value. Those rules are the Customs (Assistance in Value Declaration of Identified Imported Goods) Rules, 2023 — Notification No. 03/2023-Customs (N.T.) of 11 January 2023, in force from 11 February 2023. Under them a Screening Committee and an Evaluation Committee can have the Board specify a class of goods as "identified goods" by Order, for not less than one year and not more than two in the first instance; importers of those goods must then declare specified technical particulars in the bill of entry and meet extra evidentiary obligations, which can include a manufacturer invoice, a manufacturer test report, or costing of the goods. Rule 13 keeps the 2023 rules away from most inbound investment traffic: they do not apply to imports not involving duty, project imports, imports in non-commercial quantities, or imports where the buyer and seller are related and an investigation on the relationship is already contemplated or finalised. That last exclusion means a related-party importer already inside the Special Valuation Branch process below does not also face the 2023 rules on the same goods. Section 14(2) separately lets the CBIC Board fix tariff values by notification for any class of goods, overriding transaction value for that class. Value converts to rupees at the Board-notified exchange rate in force on the date the bill of entry (or shipping bill) is presented under section 46 or 50.

CVR 2007 — Structure

CVR 2007 runs to 13 rules plus a Schedule of Interpretative Notes. Rule 2(2) deems two persons "related" only on one of eight tests — they are officers or directors of one another's businesses; legally recognised partners in business; employer and employee; a third person directly or indirectly owns, controls or holds five per cent or more of the voting stock of both of them; one of them directly or indirectly controls the other; both are controlled by a third person; together they control a third person; or they are members of the same family. A sole agent, sole distributor or sole concessionaire counts as related only where the relationship also falls within one of those eight tests — the agency by itself is not enough. Rule 2(1) defines "identical goods" and "similar goods" for the fallback methods below.

How Value Is Determined: The Sequential Methods

Rule 3(4) is the gateway: if value cannot be determined under Rule 3 (transaction value), rules 4 to 9 apply sequentially — each tried in order, used only once every preceding one has failed.

Rule 3 (transaction value) accepts the declared price if there are no restrictions on the buyer's use beyond those required by law, geography-limited resale, or ones that do not materially affect value; the sale is not subject to an unquantifiable condition; no resale proceeds flow back to the seller (unless added under Rule 10); and the parties are not related — or, if related, the relationship did not influence the price. Rule 3(3)(b) lets an importer prove an unaffected price by showing the declared value closely approximates the transaction, deductive or computed value of identical or similar goods sold to unrelated buyers in India around the same time.

Rule 4 (identical goods) and Rule 5 (similar goods) fall back to the transaction value of identical, or failing that similar, goods exported to India around the same time at a comparable commercial level and quantity; the lowest such value is used if more than one exists. Rule 6 fixes the next order: Rule 7 (deductive value) before Rule 8 (computed value), unless the importer asks the proper officer to reverse it. Deductive value works backward from the Indian resale price of the goods, net of the usual commission/profit margin, post-import freight/insurance, and Indian duties and taxes. Computed value works forward from cost: materials and fabrication, a market-standard profit/general-expense margin for goods of that class exported to India, plus the Rule 10(2) additions. Rule 9 (residual method) is a last-resort "reasonable means" test capped at the ordinary open-market price for delivery in India, and bars use of the Indian domestic selling price of Indian-made goods, a "higher of two values" rule, the exporting country's domestic price, non-Rule-8 production cost, third-country export prices, minimum values, or arbitrary/fictitious figures.

What Gets Added to the Price: Rule 10

Rule 10 is where most disputes with foreign-invested businesses arise. To the price paid or payable, add: commissions and brokerage (except the buyer's own buying commission) and the cost of containers and packing; "assists" — materials, components, tools, dies and moulds, and engineering/design work done outside India — that the buyer supplies free or at reduced cost for producing the goods; royalties and licence fees related to the imported goods that the buyer must pay as a condition of sale; any resale, disposal or use proceeds that flow back to the seller; and any other payment made as a condition of sale, including one routed through a third party to discharge the seller's obligation.

Rule 10(2), as substituted by Notification No. 91/2017-Customs (N.T.) of 26 September 2017, then adds the cost of delivery to the place of importation under two heads: (a) transport together with loading, unloading and handling charges, and (b) insurance. Where the head (a) cost cannot be ascertained it is taken at 20% of the FOB (free-on-board) value; where insurance cannot be ascertained it is taken at 1.125% of FOB. For goods imported by air, a head (a) cost that can be ascertained is capped at 20% of FOB. Two points are often missed: the 2017 substitution folded handling into head (a) and removed the separate 1% landing charge the original rule had added, and the transport, insurance, loading, unloading and handling costs of transshipping goods on to another customs station in India are excluded. No addition may be made except as this rule provides.

Rules 11–13: Declaration, Rejection and Interpretation

Rule 11 requires the importer to disclose full and accurate valuation details and supporting documents. Rule 12 lets the proper officer, on reason to doubt a declared value's accuracy, seek further evidence; if doubt persists, transaction value is deemed not determinable under Rule 3(1) and the sequential methods apply — grounds include a materially higher value for comparable goods, an abnormal discount, misdeclaration, or fraudulent documents. Rule 13 gives the Schedule of Interpretative Notes binding effect.

Related-Party Imports and the Special Valuation Branch

Where an importer declares the seller is a related party, or a payment falls under Rule 10(1)(c) (royalty/licence fee), (d) (resale proceeds to seller) or (e) (other conditions of sale), the transaction may be referred to a Special Valuation Branch (SVB) — specialist units at Bengaluru, Chennai, Kolkata, Delhi and Mumbai — under CBIC Circular No. 5/2016-Customs, dated 9 February 2016. Three categories are never referred: samples and prototypes from related sellers; imports from related sellers where duty is unconditionally nil or fully exempt; and any transaction under Rs 1 lakh in value provided cumulative related-party transactions do not exceed Rs 25 lakh in that financial year. Additions under Rule 10(1)(a)/(b) alone (ordinary commissions, container/packing costs) also do not by themselves trigger SVB — those are decided routinely by the assessing Appraising Group.

Importers facing likely SVB scrutiny should file a prior bill of entry under the second proviso to section 46(3), preferably 15 days before the import, together with the Annexure A questionnaire — which asks whether the declared price is a "transfer price" and whether the importer or an associate holds an Advance Pricing Agreement or Advance Ruling from the Income Tax Authorities. The transfer-pricing report itself is called for later, in the Annexure B questionnaire the importer files with the SVB within 60 days. The proper officer decides within 3 days whether to recommend SVB reference; if the Commissioner agrees, goods are provisionally assessed under section 18 and the case moves to the SVB within 3 working days. Since 2016, no Extra Duty Deposit is charged by default — but if the importer does not furnish required documents within 60 days, a 5% security deposit on the declared assessable value can be imposed for up to a further three months. The SVB aims to issue an Investigation Report within two months (extendable to four with Commissioner approval, beyond that only with Chief Commissioner approval); the report is not itself appealable — the customs station uses it to finalise the assessment, issuing a show-cause notice within 15 days if price was influenced. The pre-2016 practice of periodically "renewing" an SVB order has been discontinued: an accepted order stands until circumstances genuinely change.

Why This Matters for Foreign Companies and Investors

Customs valuation and income-tax transfer pricing examine the same related-party price from opposite directions — customs checks the price is not artificially low (understating duty), while arm's-length pricing rules exist partly to check it is not artificially high in a way that shifts profit out of India. A foreign parent invoicing its Indian subsidiary for components or a technology licence must satisfy both tests with the same figure, and the SVB questionnaire asks for the transfer-pricing report to cross-check the customs position. Two consequences follow: royalty/licence-fee payments to an offshore parent are added to customs value under Rule 10(1)(c) — increasing duty on top of withholding tax on the royalty — and until an SVB case resolves, imports clear only on provisional assessment, adding working-capital and compliance overhead even without a cash security requirement.

Common Mistakes

  • Assuming an intercompany invoice price is automatically acceptable. Related-party status must be disclosed at the bill of entry stage; not declaring it risks a rejected-value finding under Rule 12.
  • Not filing the Annexure A questionnaire in advance. Filing 15 days ahead with the questionnaire and Rule 3(3)(b) evidence keeps first-time related-party clearance from stalling at the port.
  • Treating royalty payments as outside customs valuation. Any royalty or licence fee that is a condition of sale is added under Rule 10(1)(c), even if invoiced separately.
  • Ignoring the freight/insurance defaults. Where actual costs cannot be shown, CBIC applies the 20% FOB (freight) and 1.125% FOB (insurance) defaults automatically.
  • Assuming an SVB order needs periodic renewal. Since Circular 5/2016, an accepted order is permanent unless circumstances genuinely change.

Practical Example

A German manufacturer sells precision components to its wholly-owned Indian subsidiary and separately charges a technology licence fee conditional on the supply. Buyer and seller are related under Rule 2(2)(v), because the parent controls the subsidiary, and the licence fee falls under Rule 10(1)(c), so SVB reference is examined. The broker files a prior bill of entry with Annexure A about 15 days ahead, and the transfer-pricing study goes to the SVB with the Annexure B reply. The Commissioner refers the case to the Mumbai SVB; components are provisionally assessed under section 18 with no security deposit, since documents arrive on time. The SVB adds the licence fee to value under Rule 10(1)(c) in its Investigation Report, issued within two months; since the relationship did not distort the component price itself, no show-cause notice is needed on that element.

Key Takeaways

  • Value for customs duty is the transaction value under section 14 of the Customs Act, 1962, worked out under CVR 2007 — not simply the commercial invoice figure.
  • Where transaction value cannot be accepted, rules 4 to 9 apply in strict sequence: identical goods, similar goods, deductive value, computed value, then a residual "reasonable means" test.
  • Rule 10 adds commissions, assists, royalties/licence fees and resale proceeds to the price, plus freight, insurance and handling at fixed fallback percentages of FOB value.
  • Related-party imports and royalty/licence-fee payments can trigger Special Valuation Branch scrutiny under Circular 5/2016-Customs, with defined exclusions for samples and small-value transactions.
  • Customs valuation and income-tax transfer pricing test the same intercompany price for opposite risks, and SVB now specifically asks for the transfer-pricing report.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does every import from a related foreign parent get referred to the Special Valuation Branch?

No. Circular 5/2016-Customs excludes samples/prototypes, imports where duty is unconditionally nil or fully exempt, and low-value transactions — under Rs 1 lakh per transaction with cumulative related-party imports under Rs 25 lakh in the financial year. Outside these, the jurisdictional Commissioner decides case by case.

Is a security deposit required while an SVB investigation is pending?

Not by default. Since Circular 5/2016-Customs, imports are provisionally assessed under section 18 without an Extra Duty Deposit. A 5% deposit on the declared assessable value applies only if the importer misses the 60-day document deadline, and cannot continue beyond a further three months.

Are royalty payments to a foreign licensor added to customs value?

Yes, if the royalty or licence fee relates to the imported goods and payment is a condition of sale. Rule 10(1)(c) of CVR 2007 requires it to be added to the price actually paid or payable, to the extent not already included, regardless of how it is invoiced.

What happens if freight or insurance costs cannot be documented?

CVR 2007 Rule 10(2) applies fixed fallback percentages of FOB value: 20% for transport, loading, unloading and handling taken together, and 1.125% for insurance. For air cargo, a transport cost that can be ascertained is capped at 20% of FOB instead. The separate 1% landing charge disappeared when Rule 10(2) was substituted in September 2017, so an assessable value still built on it is overstated.

How does customs valuation relate to income-tax transfer pricing?

Both examine the same related-party price for opposite risks: customs valuation guards against an artificially low price that understates duty, while transfer pricing guards against pricing above arm's length that shifts profit out of India. The SVB questionnaire in Circular 5/2016-Customs asks for any transfer-pricing report filed with the Income Tax Department to cross-check the customs position.

See also: Custom Duty & Anti-Dumping Duty, Customs Documentation (Bill of Entry & Shipping Bill), and Transfer Pricing.

Need help structuring related-party imports or an SVB submission? Beacon Filing helps foreign-invested companies manage customs valuation, transfer pricing alignment, and compliance in India.

Written by Shreya Pandey, Associate, Corporate ComplianceReviewed by Dev Rao, Chartered AccountantUpdated August 29, 2026

This article is for general information only and is not legal, tax, or investment advice. Confirm current rules with the relevant authority or a qualified professional — or ask our team. See our full disclaimer.

Questions beyond the definition?

Talk to the team that files these documents every week.

Chat NowBook My Free Consultation