Skip to main content
Compliance & Taxation

Transfer Pricing

Tax rules requiring transactions between related parties in different countries to be priced at arm's length, as mandated by sections 161 to 173 of the Income-tax Act, 2025.

By Shreya PandeyUpdated September 2026

What Is Transfer Pricing?

Transfer pricing refers to the rules governing how transactions between related parties (Associated Enterprises) in different countries are priced. When an Indian subsidiary pays its foreign parent for management services, royalties, or goods — or when the parent buys services from the Indian subsidiary — Indian tax law requires these transactions to happen at arm's length. That means the price must be what two unrelated parties would have agreed on in a comparable transaction.

Without transfer pricing rules, multinational groups could shift profits to low-tax countries by manipulating inter-company prices. India's transfer pricing regime, introduced in 2001, prevents this.

Legal Framework

Transfer pricing in India is governed by:

  • Sections 161 to 173 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 (sections 92 to 92F of the Income-tax Act, 1961) — Core provisions defining international transactions, associated enterprises, and arm's length principle
  • Rules 10A to 10THD of the Income Tax Rules — Methods for determining arm's length price, documentation requirements, and safe harbour rules
  • Section 172 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 (section 92E of the Income-tax Act, 1961) — Mandatory Chartered Accountant report in Form 48 (formerly Form 3CEB) for every person entering into an international transaction
  • Section 171 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 (section 92D of the Income-tax Act, 1961) — Maintenance and keeping of information and documents
  • Section 166 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 (section 92CA of the Income-tax Act, 1961) — Reference to the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) for computing arm's length price
  • Section 169 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 (section 92CD of the Income-tax Act, 1961) — Advance Pricing Agreements (APAs)
  • Section 170 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 (section 92CE of the Income-tax Act, 1961) — Secondary adjustment provisions (deemed loan treatment)

What Is an "International Transaction"?

Section 163 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 (section 92B of the Income-tax Act, 1961) defines international transactions broadly. They include:

  • Purchase or sale of tangible property (goods, raw materials, finished products)
  • Purchase or sale of intangible property (trademarks, patents, software licenses)
  • Provision of services (management fees, technical services, shared services)
  • Lending or borrowing of money (inter-company loans, ECBs)
  • Cost-sharing arrangements
  • Business restructuring transactions
  • Guarantee fees

The definition also covers "deemed international transactions" — where a transaction with a third party is influenced by the associated enterprise (e.g., the foreign parent directs the Indian subsidiary to buy from a specific vendor).

Who Is an "Associated Enterprise"?

Under section 162 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 (section 92A of the Income-tax Act, 1961), two enterprises are associated if one participates directly or indirectly in the management, control, or capital of the other. The most common scenario: a foreign company holds 26% or more of the voting power in an Indian company. But the definition covers 13 different situations, including:

  • 26% or more shareholding
  • Appointment of 50% or more of directors
  • Dependence on intangible property owned by the other
  • Loan from one enterprise constituting 51% or more of the book value of assets

How Transfer Pricing Applies to Foreign-Owned Indian Companies

If you are a foreigner or NRI who owns an Indian company that transacts with your foreign entity, transfer pricing applies to you. Here are the most common transactions that get scrutinized:

  • Management fees — The foreign parent charges the Indian subsidiary for strategic oversight. The Indian tax authorities ask: does the Indian company actually receive a tangible benefit? If the service merely duplicates what Indian management already does, the TPO may deny the deduction.
  • Royalties and brand fees — Using the parent's brand name or technology in India. The arm's length royalty rate is benchmarked against comparable agreements. CBDT Circular No. 6/2017 on marketing intangibles is relevant here.
  • IT and shared services — Parent provides accounting, HR, or IT support. The markup on cost (typically 10-15% for routine services) must be justified through benchmarking.
  • Loans and guarantees — Inter-company loans must carry an arm's length interest rate. Corporate guarantees given by the parent for the Indian subsidiary's bank loans also attract TP scrutiny.
  • Contract R&D — Indian subsidiary conducts R&D for the parent. The markup on cost must reflect the value contributed.

Transfer Pricing Methods

Rule 10B prescribes 6 methods for determining the arm's length price. The taxpayer must select the Most Appropriate Method (MAM):

MethodBest Used For
Comparable Uncontrolled Price (CUP)Product sales where comparable market prices exist
Resale Price Method (RPM)Distribution activities where the reseller adds limited value
Cost Plus Method (CPM)Contract manufacturing, contract R&D, shared services
Profit Split Method (PSM)Highly integrated operations where both parties contribute unique intangibles
Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM)Most commonly used in India — compares net profit margin against comparable companies
Other MethodIntroduced in 2012 — includes valuation approaches for intangibles

In practice, over 80% of Indian TP cases use TNMM as the MAM, according to CBDT data.

Documentation Requirements (Section 171)

Every company with international transactions must maintain:

  • Master File — group-level information about the multinational's global operations, TP policies, and value chain (required if consolidated group revenue exceeds INR 500 crores)
  • Local File — entity-level information about the Indian company's international transactions, functions, assets, risks, and benchmarking analysis
  • Country-by-Country Report (CbCR) — Filed by the Indian entity if the parent's consolidated revenue exceeds INR 5,500 crores (approximately EUR 750 million). Filed in Form 3CEAC/3CEAD.

Form 48 — The Annual TP Report

Under Section 172, a CA must certify Form 48 reporting all international transactions and the methods used. This must be filed before the due date of the income tax return — November 30 of the assessment year for companies with international transactions.

Penalties

  • Failure to maintain documentation — 2% of the value of each international transaction (Section 442 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 (section 271AA of the Income-tax Act, 1961))
  • Failure to furnish Form 48 — a fee of INR 50,000, rising to INR 1,00,000, under section 428(d) of the Income-tax Act, 2025 (section 271BA of the Income-tax Act, 1961)
  • TP adjustment by TPO — If the TPO determines the arm's length price is higher than what the company reported, the difference is added to income. Tax plus interest at 1-1.5% per month applies on the additional income.
  • Penalty on TP adjustment — If the adjustment exceeds the lesser of INR 10 crores or 10% of book profit, a penalty of 50% of tax on the adjustment applies under Section 439 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 (section 270A of the Income-tax Act, 1961)
  • Secondary adjustment (Section 170) — If the TP adjustment exceeds INR 1 crore and the excess amount is not repatriated to India within 90 days, it is treated as a deemed loan. Interest at SBI rate + 3% is imputed and taxed.

Common Mistakes

  • No benchmarking study done — Many small foreign-owned companies assume TP rules only apply to large multinationals. Any company with international transactions, regardless of size, must maintain TP documentation.
  • Management fees without substance — Paying the parent company for "strategic advisory" without documenting the specific services received, hours spent, and tangible benefits leads to full disallowance by the TPO.
  • Using global comparables instead of Indian comparables — Indian TP law requires benchmarking against comparable Indian companies, not global ones. Using US or European margin data gets rejected.
  • Ignoring the secondary adjustment — After a TP adjustment, if the excess money is not brought back to India within 90 days, you pay interest on a deemed loan. Many companies do not even know this provision exists.
  • Not filing Form 48 on time — The deadline is tied to the ITR due date (November 30). Filing even a day late attracts the section 428(d) fee of INR 50,000, rising to INR 1,00,000.

Practical Example

A UK company sets up a 100% subsidiary in Noida to provide software testing services. The Indian entity has 50 employees and generates all its revenue from the UK parent. The engagement is structured as contract service provision — the Indian company is reimbursed at cost plus 15%. For TP purposes, the company's CA identifies TNMM as the most appropriate method. Using the Prowess/Capitaline database, 15 comparable Indian IT services companies are identified with operating margins ranging from 8% to 22%, with a median of 14%. Since the Indian company earns 15% — within the arm's length range — no adjustment is needed. Form 48 is filed by October 31, and the ITR by November 30.

Related Terms

Transfer pricing can make or break your India tax position. Beacon Filing works with specialist TP advisors to prepare documentation and file Form 48 for foreign-owned companies.

Written by Shreya Pandey, Associate, Corporate ComplianceReviewed by Dev Rao, Chartered AccountantUpdated September 4, 2026

This article is for general information only and is not legal, tax, or investment advice. Confirm current rules with the relevant authority or a qualified professional — or ask our team. See our full disclaimer.

Further Reading

Related Terms

Questions about Transfer Pricing in practice? Our team can help.

India Entry Strategy

Questions beyond the definition?

Talk to the team that files these documents every week.

Chat NowBook My Free Consultation