Quick answer: Under Article 12(2) of the India-China DTAA, fees for technical services are capped at 10% of the gross amount, versus India's domestic withholding rate of 20% (about 20.8% to 21.84% with surcharge and cess) under section 207(2) (Table, Sl. No. 2) of the Income-tax Act, 2025 (section 115A of the Income-tax Act, 1961) -- a saving exceeding 10 percentage points on every FTS payment. The treaty has no “make available” test, but Article 12(4) does carry a place-of-provision nexus — the services must be provided by a resident of one state in the other — and a Chinese provider's PE-connected fees are instead taxed as business profits at up to 35%.
Key takeaways:
- FTS treaty rate is capped at 10% under Article 12(2), versus a domestic rate of 20%.
- No make-available test exists, but Article 12(4) requires the services to be provided in the other state.
- The substituted Article 5(3)(b) services PE covers services other than technical services, so technical services stay in Article 12.
- Domestic FTS rate doubled from 10% to 20% under the Finance Act 2023.
- PE-connected FTS is taxed as business profits at up to 35% under Article 7.
Fees for Technical Services Tax Rate Between India and China
The India-China Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement (DTAA), signed on 18 July 1994 and amended through a protocol on 26 November 2018, caps the withholding tax rate on fees for technical services (FTS) at 10% of the gross amount under Article 12. FTS is defined broadly in the treaty to include payments for managerial, technical, or consultancy services rendered by a resident of one Contracting State to a payer in the other.
Following the Finance Act 2023, India's domestic withholding tax on FTS under section 207(2) was doubled from 10% to 20%. With surcharge and 4% health & education cess, the effective domestic rate is 20.8% where no surcharge applies and 21.216% or 21.84% for a foreign company bearing the 2% or 5% surcharge. The DTAA rate of 10% therefore delivers savings exceeding 10% on every FTS payment between India and China.
The India-China DTAA treats FTS within the same Article 12 as royalties, applying an identical 10% rate to both. This combined treatment simplifies compliance but raises important classification questions about whether a particular payment constitutes FTS, royalties, or business profits — each carrying different tax consequences.
Treaty Rate vs Domestic Rate: Detailed Comparison
The post-2023 rate differential makes treaty benefits critical for India-China technical service arrangements:
| Category | DTAA Rate | Pre-2023 Domestic Rate | Current Domestic Rate | Savings vs Current | Article |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FTS (general) | 10% | 10% + surcharge + cess (~10.4%) | 20% + surcharge + cess (20.8% with cess only; 21.216% or 21.84% with the 2% or 5% surcharge) | 10.8-11.84 percentage points | Article 12(2) |
Before the Finance Act 2023 amendment, the domestic FTS rate under section 115A of the Income-tax Act, 1961 was 10%, making the treaty rate only marginally beneficial (eliminating surcharge and cess). Since 1 April 2023, the domestic rate doubled to 20%, transforming the 10% treaty rate from a minor optimisation into an essential tax planning tool. Chinese companies providing technical, managerial, or consultancy services to Indian entities now save over 10% on every payment by claiming treaty benefits.
On China's side, domestic withholding tax on service fees paid to non-residents is 10% under Enterprise Income Tax Law, subject to certain conditions. The DTAA provides reciprocal protection for Indian service providers receiving FTS payments from Chinese entities.
For structuring cross-border service arrangements, consult our tax advisory and transfer pricing services.
Who Qualifies for the Reduced Rate
Claiming the 10% treaty rate on FTS requires meeting several conditions under Article 12 and the treaty's general anti-abuse provisions:
Beneficial Ownership Requirement
Article 12(2) restricts the reduced rate to FTS where the beneficial owner of the fees is a resident of the other Contracting State. The beneficial owner must have genuine economic entitlement to the income — not merely receive it as an intermediary or agent obligated to pass it on. Back-to-back service arrangements where a Chinese entity subcontracts the actual work to a third-country entity are vulnerable to denial of treaty benefits.
Definition of FTS — Article 12(4)
Under the India-China DTAA, fees for technical services means any payment for the provision of services of a managerial, technical or consultancy nature by a resident of one Contracting State in the other Contracting State. The definition does not include a "make available" requirement — a critical distinction from DTAAs with countries like the USA and UK — so it does not matter whether the recipient is enabled to apply the technical knowledge independently. It does, however, carry a place-of-provision nexus that most Indian FTS articles lack: services rendered wholly outside India are arguably outside the Article 12 definition, a point on which the position is not settled.
No Permanent Establishment Connection
If the beneficial owner carries on business through a permanent establishment (PE) in the source state, and the services generating the FTS are effectively connected with that PE, the fees are taxed as business profits under Article 7. A Chinese consulting firm with a project office or PE in India cannot claim the 10% FTS rate on service fees connected to its Indian PE — such fees are subject to net-basis taxation at up to 35%.
Principal Purpose Test (PPT) — Article 27A
The 2018 Protocol introduced a Principal Purpose Test aligned with BEPS Action 6. Arrangements where obtaining the 10% FTS rate is one of the principal purposes may be denied treaty benefits. This targets service fee routing structures and interposition of Chinese entities to access the treaty rate.
India's GAAR Provisions
India's General Anti-Avoidance Rules under Chapter X-A of the Income Tax Act, effective from 1 April 2017, independently deny treaty benefits for arrangements lacking commercial substance. A service contract structured primarily to access the treaty rate, without genuine business rationale for engaging the Chinese entity, is vulnerable to GAAR scrutiny.
FTS-Specific Treaty Provisions Under Article 12
Article 12 addresses both royalties and FTS in a combined provision. The key FTS-specific elements include:
Article 12(1): Primary Taxing Right
FTS arising in a Contracting State and paid to a resident of the other Contracting State may be taxed in that other State. The residence state has the primary right to tax FTS income.
Article 12(2): Source State Rate Cap
The source state may also tax FTS, but the tax shall not exceed 10% of the gross amount of the fees if the beneficial owner is a resident of the other Contracting State. This is a flat rate with no tiering based on the type of service, the service provider's status, or the quantum of fees.
Article 12(4): Definition of FTS
The treaty text reads: the term "fees for technical services" means any payment for the provision of services of managerial, technical or consultancy nature by a resident of a Contracting State in the other Contracting State, but does not include payment for activities mentioned in paragraph 2(k) of Article 5 and Article 15 of the Agreement. The definition therefore excludes:
- Activities falling under what was paragraph 2(k) of Article 5 — a cross-reference to the old service-PE clause of the 1994 Article 5, which the 2018 Protocol substituted in its entirety, leaving the reference without a live counterpart
- Payments for dependent personal services under Article 15 (employment income)
Note what the definition does not say: it carries no "including the provision of services of technical or other personnel" limb (that phrasing belongs to other Indian treaties), and no carve-out for teaching or for independent personal services under Article 14. Within its scope the definition is broad — managerial, technical, and consultancy services with no "make available" filter — but it is bounded by the requirement that the services be provided in the other Contracting State.
Article 12(5): PE Exception
If the beneficial owner has a PE in the source state and the services are effectively connected with that PE, Article 12 does not apply. Instead, the FTS is taxed as business profits under Article 7, subject to net-basis taxation at applicable corporate rates.
Documentation Required for Claiming the Reduced Rate
Indian entities paying FTS to Chinese service providers must maintain proper documentation before applying the 10% treaty rate:
Tax Residency Certificate (TRC)
The Chinese service provider must obtain a valid Tax Residency Certificate (TRC) from China's State Taxation Administration confirming tax residency in China for the relevant financial year.
Form 41 (formerly Form 10F)
Under section 159 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 (section 90(5) of the Income-tax Act, 1961), read with the rules prescribed for the purpose, the non-resident must furnish Form 41 to the Indian payer. This self-declaration provides supplementary information including the assessee's status, nationality, PAN (if applicable), and period of residential status in China.
Self-Declaration and No-PE Certificate
A self-declaration confirming that: (a) the Chinese entity is the beneficial owner of the FTS; (b) the services are not effectively connected with a PE in India; and (c) the service arrangement is not part of a conduit structure designed primarily to access treaty benefits.
Service Agreement and Deliverables
The underlying service agreement, statements of work, and evidence of service delivery should be maintained. For transfer pricing purposes, the agreement should clearly specify the nature of services, deliverables, timelines, and pricing methodology. For FEMA compliance, service fee remittances may require documentation with the authorised dealer bank.
Withholding Procedure for Indian Payers
The withholding compliance process for FTS payments to Chinese service providers under section 393(2) of the Income-tax Act, 2025 (Table, Sl. No. 17; section 195 of the Income-tax Act, 1961):
Step 1: Classify the Payment
Determine whether the payment constitutes FTS (managerial, technical, or consultancy services), royalties (use of IP), or business profits (general commercial services). The classification directly affects the applicable rate and article. Payments for routine procurement support, quality inspections, or market research may raise classification disputes.
Step 2: Verify Treaty Eligibility
Confirm the Chinese service provider's tax residency through the TRC, verify beneficial ownership, and ensure no PE connection exists. Note that the services PE clause in the substituted Article 5(3)(b) is expressly limited to services other than technical services as defined in Article 12, so a long Indian presence by technical personnel does not by itself create a services PE. A PE can still arise on other grounds — a fixed place of business under Article 5(1)-(2), a building site, installation or supervisory activity exceeding 183 days under Article 5(3)(a), or a dependent agent — and where the fees are effectively connected with such a PE, Article 12(5) sends them to Article 7 instead of the 10% cap.
Step 3: Deduct TDS at the Treaty Rate
Deduct TDS at 10% of the gross FTS amount. No surcharge or cess applies at the treaty rate. If documentation is incomplete, apply the full domestic rate of 20% plus surcharge and cess (20.8% to 21.84%).
Step 4: File Forms 145 and 146 (formerly Forms 15CA and 15CB)
For remittances exceeding INR 5 lakh, file Form 145 online after uploading the CA's certificate in Form 146. The CA must reference Article 12(2) and the 10% rate. For comprehensive compliance support, see our FEMA-RBI compliance services.
Step 5: Deposit TDS and File Returns
Deposit TDS by the 7th of the following month (30 April for March payments). File quarterly TDS returns in Form 144 (formerly Form 27Q). Maintain all documentation — TRC, Form 41, self-declarations, service agreements, and payment proofs — for a minimum of six years.
Common Disputes and Judicial Precedents
FTS taxation under India-China DTAA has generated significant litigation:
FTS vs Business Profits — The Classification Challenge
A recurring dispute concerns whether payments for services truly constitute FTS or should be classified as business profits under Article 7. If a Chinese entity provides services without any managerial, technical, or consultancy element — such as pure operational support, data processing, or routine administrative functions — the payment may not qualify as FTS. If classified as business profits and the Chinese entity has no PE in India, the payment is not taxable in India at all, resulting in zero withholding.
No "Make Available" Requirement
The India-China DTAA does not include a "make available" clause for FTS. This contrasts sharply with DTAAs like India-USA and India-UK, where FTS is taxable only if the services "make available" technical knowledge that enables the recipient to independently apply the technology. Under the India-China DTAA, any payment for managerial, technical, or consultancy services provided in the other Contracting State qualifies as FTS — a broader scope that benefits the source state's taxing rights, though the place-of-provision wording in Article 12(4) leaves room to argue that wholly offshore-rendered services fall outside it.
Service PE and FTS Interaction
The 2018 Protocol replaced Article 5 in full. Its services PE clause, Article 5(3)(b), applies to "the furnishing of services other than technical services as defined in Article 12" through employees or other personnel for the same or a connected project, where the activity continues for more than 183 days in any 12-month period. Because technical services are carved out of that clause, technical, managerial and consultancy fees remain in Article 12 and are not converted into business profits merely by a long Indian presence. A PE may nonetheless arise on other grounds — a fixed place of business, a building site or installation or supervisory activity lasting more than 183 days under Article 5(3)(a), or a dependent agent under the Protocol's BEPS-style agency clause. Where the fees are effectively connected with such a PE, Article 12(5) disapplies the 10% cap and the profits are taxed under Article 7 on a net basis at the 35% foreign-company rate plus surcharge and cess.
Transfer Pricing on Service Fees
Service fees between associated enterprises (such as an Indian subsidiary and its Chinese parent) are subject to transfer pricing scrutiny under Section 161 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 (section 92 of the Income-tax Act, 1961). The Transfer Pricing Officer may apply the comparable uncontrolled price (CUP) method or the transactional net margin method (TNMM) to benchmark the service fee. Adjustments by the TPO increase the taxable amount and corresponding TDS obligation.
Reimbursement of Expenses vs FTS
Disputes frequently arise over whether reimbursements of out-of-pocket expenses by an Indian payer to a Chinese service provider constitute FTS. The ITAT has held in various cases that pure cost reimbursements without any markup or profit element do not constitute FTS, provided the Indian payer can demonstrate that the amounts represent actual expenses incurred by the Chinese entity on behalf of the Indian payer. Proper documentation of expense reimbursement — with supporting invoices and evidence — is critical.
Practical Examples and Calculations
Example 1: Chinese Engineering Consultancy Providing Technical Services
A Chinese engineering firm provides technical consultancy services to an Indian infrastructure company for a metro project. Annual service fee: USD 800,000 (approximately INR 6,72,00,000 at INR 84/USD).
- Without DTAA: TDS at 20% + 2% surcharge + 4% cess = 21.216% = INR 1,42,57,152 withheld
- With DTAA (Article 12(2)): TDS at 10%, with no surcharge or cess on a treaty rate = INR 67,20,000 withheld
- Tax saving: INR 75,37,152 per year
Example 2: Chinese Management Consultancy to Indian Subsidiary
A Chinese parent company provides management and strategic advisory services to its Indian subsidiary. Quarterly service fee: INR 1,50,00,000 (annual: INR 6,00,00,000).
- Without DTAA: TDS at 21.216% (20% + 2% surcharge + 4% cess) = INR 1,27,29,600 withheld annually
- With DTAA (Article 12(2)): TDS at 10% = INR 60,00,000 withheld annually
- Tax saving: INR 67,29,600 per year
Note: Since this is an inter-company arrangement, the service fee must be at arm's length under transfer pricing rules. A contemporaneous transfer pricing study documenting the arm's length nature of the fee is essential.
Example 3: Long Indian Presence and the PE Question
A Chinese IT company sends 10 engineers to India for a software implementation project. The engineers are present in India for 200 days over a 12-month period. Length of stay alone does not settle the answer under this treaty: Article 5(3)(b) excludes technical services from the services PE clause, so implementation work that is technical in nature does not become a PE simply by crossing 183 days. What matters is whether the company has a fixed place of business at its disposal in India (a project office, dedicated client premises), whether the engagement is a building site, installation or supervisory activity exceeding 183 days under Article 5(3)(a), or whether someone in India habitually concludes contracts or plays the principal role in concluding them. If any of those is met and the fees are effectively connected with that PE, Article 12(5) applies and the attributable profits are taxed under Article 7 on a net basis at the 35% foreign-company rate, with expenses deductible. If none is met, the fees stay within Article 12 at the 10% cap.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the FTS tax rate under the India-China DTAA?
Under Article 12(2) of the India-China DTAA, the maximum withholding tax rate on fees for technical services is 10% of the gross amount when the beneficial owner is a resident of the other Contracting State. This compares favourably with India's current domestic rate of 20% plus surcharge and cess (20.8% to 21.84%).
What types of services qualify as FTS?
Article 12(4) defines FTS as any payment for the provision of services of a managerial, technical or consultancy nature by a resident of one Contracting State in the other Contracting State. There is no "make available" requirement, so it makes no difference whether technical knowledge is transferred to the recipient. Unlike several other Indian treaties, this definition has no "provision of services of technical or other personnel" limb, and it does require the services to be provided in the other state.
Is there a make available test for FTS under this treaty?
No. Unlike DTAAs with the USA and UK, the India-China DTAA does not include a "make available" clause for FTS. This gives the source state (India) broader taxing rights — all managerial, technical, and consultancy service payments to Chinese entities are potentially taxable as FTS.
What documentation is required to claim the 10% rate?
The Chinese service provider must provide: (1) a valid Tax Residency Certificate from China's State Taxation Administration, (2) Form 41 self-declaration, and (3) a beneficial ownership and no-PE declaration. The Indian payer must file Form 145/Form 146 for remittances exceeding INR 5 lakh.
When does a service PE get triggered?
Under Article 5(3)(b) as substituted by the 2018 Protocol, a services PE arises where an enterprise furnishes services other than technical services through employees or other personnel, for the same or a connected project, for more than 183 days in any 12-month period. Technical services are expressly carved out, so they stay within Article 12. A PE can still arise through a fixed place of business, a building site or installation or supervisory activity exceeding 183 days under Article 5(3)(a), or a dependent agent — and where the fees are effectively connected with it, Article 12(5) sends them to Article 7.
Are expense reimbursements subject to TDS as FTS?
Pure cost reimbursements without any markup or profit element generally do not constitute FTS, provided the Indian payer can demonstrate they represent actual third-party expenses incurred by the Chinese entity. Proper documentation with supporting invoices is critical to avoid reclassification.
How does the Finance Act 2023 impact FTS taxation?
The Finance Act 2023 doubled the domestic FTS withholding rate from 10% to 20% under section 207(2), effective 1 April 2023. The 10% DTAA rate now delivers savings exceeding 10.8% compared to the domestic rate, making treaty benefit claims essential for Chinese service providers.
This article is for general information only and is not legal, tax, or investment advice. Confirm current rules with the relevant authority or a qualified professional — or ask our team. See our full disclaimer.
Doing business between India and China? Our team handles the treaty filings.
Tax Advisory for Foreign Investors in IndiaChina — Dividend Rates
DTAA Rate vs Domestic Rate
| Income Category | DTAA Rate | Domestic Rate | Article |
|---|---|---|---|
| General Beneficial owner is a resident of the other Contracting State; flat rate regardless of shareholding | 10% | 20% (plus surcharge and cess) | Article 10(2) |
China — Interest Rates
DTAA Rate vs Domestic Rate
| Income Category | DTAA Rate | Domestic Rate | Article |
|---|---|---|---|
| General Beneficial owner is a resident of the other Contracting State | 10% | 20% (plus surcharge and cess) | Article 11(2) |
| Government and government-owned financial institutions Interest paid to or guaranteed by the Government, central bank, or wholly government-owned financial institutions | 0% (Exempt) | 20% (plus surcharge and cess) | Article 11(3) |
China — Royalty Rates
DTAA Rate vs Domestic Rate
| Income Category | DTAA Rate | Domestic Rate | Article |
|---|---|---|---|
| General Royalties for use of or right to use intellectual property; beneficial owner is a resident of the other Contracting State | 10% | 20% (plus surcharge and cess) | Article 12(2) |
China — FTS Rates
DTAA Rate vs Domestic Rate
| Income Category | DTAA Rate | Domestic Rate | Article |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fees for technical services Fees for managerial, technical, or consultancy services; beneficial owner is a resident of the other Contracting State | 10% | 20% (plus surcharge and cess) | Article 12(2) |